200 Mistakes Hacker Might Make, And How A Network Security Professionals Can Find It Out.
Mistake a Hacker Might Make | How Network Security Professionals Can Find It |
---|---|
1. Overusing the same IP address for multiple attacks | Monitor and analyze incoming traffic patterns, set up alerts for repeated attacks from the same IP. |
2. Failing to cover tracks after an attack | Review logs for unusual activities such as suspicious login attempts, file changes, and error logs. |
3. Ignoring logs of the target system | Perform regular log reviews and enable centralized logging to detect anomalies or unexpected access. |
4. Not encrypting sensitive data during transfer | Conduct packet sniffing and network analysis for unencrypted sensitive data in transit. |
5. Failing to change default passwords | Use automated tools to scan for devices with default passwords or conduct vulnerability assessments. |
6. Not properly concealing malicious payloads | Perform signature-based and heuristic malware scans on systems to detect suspicious files. |
7. Overlooking the security of the tools used | Audit security tools regularly, check for outdated or vulnerable versions, and monitor for tool misuse. |
8. Underestimating the impact of leaving a backdoor | Perform regular vulnerability scans and penetration testing to identify hidden backdoors. |
9. Using easily traceable attack methods | Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) to analyze attack signatures and detect known attack techniques. |
10. Not using anonymous networks (e.g., Tor) | Monitor traffic for unusual routing patterns and use threat intelligence to track common attack infrastructure. |
11. Failing to update or patch vulnerabilities | Run vulnerability scanning tools and set alerts for missing security patches or outdated systems. |
12. Using outdated exploits | Stay updated with CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) databases, and monitor for known exploit signatures. |
13. Failing to hide the attack origin | Analyze traffic logs for anomalies, such as geolocation mismatches or traffic from unusual IP addresses. |
14. Not using obfuscation or encryption for malicious traffic | Monitor network traffic for unencrypted malicious data and use deep packet inspection (DPI). |
15. Overreliance on automated tools | Audit and review the use of tools, and check for abnormal or excessive traffic patterns associated with automated attacks. |
16. Not covering DNS communications | Implement DNS filtering and monitor DNS traffic for unusual request patterns or domain requests. |
17. Failing to use secure methods for data exfiltration | Monitor outbound traffic for irregularities, such as large amounts of data sent to untrusted destinations. |
18. Ignoring the victim’s defense measures | Perform red team assessments, vulnerability assessments, and ensure defense mechanisms are properly configured. |
19. Overusing the same attack vectors | Analyze incident logs for recurring attack patterns or repeated use of specific attack methods. |
20. Using signature-based attacks | Employ IDS/IPS systems to detect known signatures and use anomaly detection to catch deviations. |
21. Failing to test for detection systems | Conduct regular penetration testing and simulate attacks to identify potential blind spots in detection systems. |
22. Using predictable payloads | Use malware analysis tools to examine payloads for common or easily detectable structures and patterns. |
23. Not employing stealthy persistence mechanisms | Review logs for signs of unusual processes, services, or scheduled tasks that persist after reboot. |
24. Failing to hide command-and-control (C&C) infrastructure | Monitor outbound traffic for communication with known C&C servers and use threat intelligence feeds. |
25. Overcomplicating the attack for no reason | Evaluate attack behavior with tools like SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) that analyze unnecessary complexity. |
26. Underestimating endpoint protection mechanisms | Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools to identify abnormal behavior and potential threats. |
27. Not securing communications between compromised systems | Monitor internal traffic for unencrypted communication or suspicious connections between systems. |
28. Failing to analyze the target’s network environment | Conduct network mapping and vulnerability scanning to detect weaknesses or exposed systems. |
29. Overlooking the use of sandboxing by security systems | Perform sandboxing analysis to detect and evaluate suspicious files and behavior in isolated environments. |
30. Failing to cover the attack origin through proxies | Review outbound traffic and use threat intelligence to identify proxy usage and potential attack routes. |
31. Neglecting post-attack cleanup | Monitor for artifacts or traces of malware or exploits left behind in system memory or logs. |
32. Failing to use decoy traffic to mask real malicious activity | Use traffic analysis and anomaly detection to distinguish between normal and suspicious traffic patterns. |
33. Failing to adapt to dynamic defense mechanisms | Continuously monitor the system for changes in defense tactics and perform regular threat assessments. |
34. Not evading behavior-based detection systems | Use behavioral analysis tools to detect abnormal activity and investigate deviations from baseline behaviors. |
35. Underestimating the target's ability to detect anomalies | Set up anomaly detection and continuous monitoring to detect irregular activities such as spikes in traffic. |
36. Using easily identifiable tools | Perform tool-based analysis and look for known attack signatures and behaviors associated with specific hacking tools. |
37. Overlooking multi-factor authentication bypass techniques | Test systems with multi-factor authentication and look for failed attempts or weaknesses in the authentication process. |
38. Failing to secure or encrypt local storage | Implement full disk encryption and use endpoint monitoring tools to detect insecure storage practices. |
39. Relying too much on social engineering without proper cover | Monitor for social engineering attempts such as phishing emails and anomalous interactions with personnel. |
40. Using predictable attack patterns | Implement behavioral analytics to detect predictable or repetitive attack patterns and flag them for review. |
41. Not making the attack look like a typical user activity | Use user behavior analytics (UBA) to compare the attack pattern with legitimate user activities. |
42. Overlooking encrypted channels for exfiltration | Monitor traffic for the presence of encrypted tunnels (e.g., SSL/TLS) and deep packet inspection to detect exfiltration. |
43. Using known, easily tracked IP addresses | Use geolocation tools and monitor for unusual IP addresses that don't match typical organizational traffic patterns. |
44. Using too many hard-coded attack parameters | Conduct static code analysis and behavioral testing to detect hardcoded values that are easily traceable. |
45. Overusing custom-built exploits | Regularly test for known vulnerabilities and conduct vulnerability assessments to spot custom exploits. |
46. Not keeping attack tools or scripts updated | Monitor for outdated malware signatures and perform regular tool and script reviews to keep them current. |
47. Using common exploits that are well-known and patched | Use up-to-date vulnerability management systems and patch management tools to detect use of outdated exploits. |
48. Neglecting to secure reverse shells or backdoors | Review network traffic for suspicious inbound or outbound connections and inspect processes for reverse shell activity. |
49. Ignoring the target’s patching cycle | Monitor for unpatched vulnerabilities on systems and maintain a patch management system to ensure timely updates. |
50. Using the same domain or IP for multiple attacks | Monitor DNS logs and IP address reputations to detect domain/IP reuse across different attack campaigns. |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mistake a Hacker Might Make | How Network Security Professionals Can Find It |
---|---|
51. Failing to understand the target’s operating system | Use OS fingerprinting tools to identify inconsistencies in attack patterns and mismatches between the attack vector and the operating system. |
52. Underestimating the power of network segmentation | Analyze network topology and traffic flow using segmentation-aware monitoring tools to detect lateral movement or unauthorized access across segments. |
53. Using poorly obfuscated or recognizable malware | Employ anti-virus/anti-malware solutions and behavioral analysis tools to identify known malware signatures or behavioral anomalies. |
54. Leaving unused attack tools or artifacts behind | Regular system scans for unusual files, hidden directories, or scripts left behind by the hacker, using forensic analysis tools. |
55. Failing to disable or clean unused ports after an attack | Regularly scan and audit network ports using tools like Nmap to ensure that unnecessary ports are closed after an attack. |
56. Leaving traces in system memory | Perform memory forensics to check for residual malicious code or data left in RAM after an attack. |
57. Not using anti-forensic techniques | Use forensics tools to detect any anti-forensic measures like timestamp manipulation or deleted logs. |
58. Underestimating the role of endpoint detection and response (EDR) | Monitor endpoint security logs for unusual activities and ensure EDR solutions are updated to detect known attack patterns. |
59. Failing to compromise the target's backup systems | Review backup access control logs and monitor for unexpected changes in backup configurations or data restoration activities. |
60. Using weak cryptographic methods | Monitor for weak encryption algorithms or insecure SSL/TLS configurations using tools like Qualys SSL Labs. |
61. Ignoring DNS filtering solutions | Set up DNS filtering and analyze DNS traffic for anomalies like suspicious domain requests or communication with blacklisted domains. |
62. Not securing payload delivery methods | Use firewalls and intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to detect suspicious payload delivery methods such as exploits or unusual downloads. |
63. Failing to manipulate traffic in ways that prevent detection | Implement network traffic analysis and deep packet inspection (DPI) to detect abnormal patterns that could indicate malicious traffic. |
64. Ignoring attack detection in real-time monitoring systems | Continuously monitor logs from intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) systems for real-time alerts. |
65. Failing to break into the target’s DNS infrastructure | Use DNS monitoring tools to identify attacks against DNS servers, such as unauthorized queries or manipulation of DNS records. |
66. Not verifying the attack success with testing | Use penetration testing or red team exercises to verify the attack's effectiveness and ensure post-exploitation access is maintained. |
67. Over-relying on open-source attack tools | Regularly audit and review attack tools, ensuring they don’t contain known vulnerabilities or easily detectable signatures. |
68. Not assessing the target’s anti-virus capabilities | Scan for known antivirus software and evaluate its capability to detect specific threats using malware analysis and testing. |
69. Ignoring the target's cloud environment defenses | Perform cloud security audits and monitor for vulnerabilities in the cloud infrastructure using cloud-native security tools and SIEM solutions. |
70. Not simulating attacks under real-world conditions | Conduct simulated attacks under real-world conditions (e.g., red teaming, live-fire drills) to detect potential security gaps in the target environment. |
71. Using visible or poorly disguised exploits | Use advanced threat hunting techniques to detect exploits that have known signatures or are too obvious for detection systems. |
72. Ignoring local privilege escalation vulnerabilities | Perform privilege escalation testing and utilize tools like "LinPEAS" or "Windows Exploit Suggester" to identify privilege elevation opportunities. |
73. Leaving open ports after exploitation | Implement continuous port scanning and network monitoring tools to identify newly opened or unusual ports post-exploitation. |
74. Using a single attack vector | Conduct a multi-layered defense analysis to detect repeated use of a single attack vector and ensure redundancy in security checks. |
75. Failing to clean up web shells or script injections | Regularly scan web servers for unauthorized scripts or web shells and perform code reviews to ensure no malicious injections remain. |
76. Not considering physical security when targeting systems | Conduct physical security assessments to ensure that physical access points like USB ports and devices aren’t being exploited. |
77. Overlooking the target’s mobile device vulnerabilities | Monitor mobile network traffic and conduct mobile device security audits to identify vulnerabilities in apps or services. |
78. Using low-level exploits on high-value targets | Employ advanced intrusion detection systems (IDS) to detect more sophisticated or stealthy attacks on high-value targets. |
79. Ignoring potential insider threats at the target | Implement user behavior analytics (UBA) and monitor employee actions to detect anomalies or indicators of insider threats. |
80. Failing to access critical databases first | Use database activity monitoring (DAM) tools to track and alert on unauthorized access attempts to sensitive data. |
81. Not covering traces in database logs | Implement log management systems and configure secure logging policies to ensure traces of malicious activities are erased. |
82. Failing to disable logging on compromised systems | Continuously audit system logs for suspicious activities and use SIEM tools to identify irregularities in log data. |
83. Not utilizing multi-tiered attack strategies | Monitor attack trends and behaviors using network analysis to spot patterns of multi-layered attack techniques. |
84. Failing to utilize DNS tunneling or other covert communication methods | Monitor DNS traffic for abnormal tunneling behavior or unusual domain name requests that could indicate covert communication. |
85. Underestimating the effectiveness of endpoint security systems | Regularly assess endpoint protection effectiveness and use endpoint detection tools to identify vulnerabilities or intrusions. |
86. Leaving malware traces on compromised systems | Use malware analysis tools and conduct regular scans to detect residual malware files left behind after an attack. |
87. Overlooking the impact of backup systems | Continuously monitor backup logs and review backup strategies to ensure they aren’t a target or weak link in the defense strategy. |
88. Not considering physical access requirements in the attack | Perform physical security audits and monitor access control systems to ensure that physical security vulnerabilities are not overlooked. |
89. Failing to use obfuscation in traffic or payloads | Use packet inspection tools to detect obfuscation techniques or other traffic manipulation that could bypass detection systems. |
90. Failing to assess the effectiveness of social engineering | Use phishing simulation tools and social engineering test scenarios to identify vulnerabilities in employee awareness and behaviors. |
91. Not considering the legal implications of the attack | Ensure that all activities, including penetration tests, are performed within legal boundaries and comply with regulations. |
92. Overlooking wireless network vulnerabilities | Perform wireless network assessments (e.g., Wi-Fi scanning) to detect weak or insecure wireless access points. |
93. Leaving known attack signatures on the victim system | Use signature-based detection tools and IDS/IPS systems to identify known attack patterns left behind on compromised systems. |
94. Failing to secure the entry point or initial access | Implement honeypots, intrusion detection systems (IDS), and continuous monitoring to catch unauthorized access early. |
95. Relying on brute force without considering alternatives | Use password complexity rules and account lockout policies to mitigate brute force attacks, while monitoring for failed login attempts. |
96. Not using privilege escalation methods on compromised machines | Perform regular privilege escalation testing and use tools to scan for weak configurations that allow privilege elevation. |
97. Overlooking the target’s security monitoring tools | Audit security monitoring configurations to ensure no blind spots and conduct red team exercises to test detection systems. |
98. Not understanding the victim's business model and defenses | Perform detailed reconnaissance of the target’s operations, security posture, and defense capabilities before an attack. |
99. Failing to use fake or decoy credentials | Implement multi-layered defenses that flag and block unusual authentication patterns, such as access attempts with decoy credentials. |
100. Not planning escape routes for post-exploitation activities | Maintain robust monitoring systems and forensic capabilities to identify any attempts to exfiltrate data or perform lateral movement. |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mistake a Hacker Might Make | How Network Security Professionals Can Find It |
---|---|
101. Using easily detectable IP geolocation for attack | Use geolocation tools to analyze incoming attack traffic for unusual or easily traceable locations, and correlate with attack patterns. |
102. Failing to update and hide C&C infrastructure | Monitor network traffic for patterns that connect to known or outdated command-and-control (C&C) infrastructure, and use threat intelligence feeds for indicators of compromise. |
103. Leaving logs on compromised systems | Conduct regular log file audits and use file integrity monitoring to detect traces of unauthorized access. |
104. Overlooking the security of backup systems | Review backup logs and configurations for weaknesses, and implement backup security audits to ensure integrity and safety. |
105. Not using trusted encryption for stored files | Use encryption monitoring tools to ensure that stored data is encrypted properly and flagged for non-compliant files. |
106. Using publicly known exploit kits | Monitor network traffic for known exploit kit signatures and patterns, leveraging intrusion detection systems (IDS) to flag well-known attack vectors. |
107. Ignoring buffer overflow vulnerabilities | Use vulnerability scanners to identify buffer overflow risks and ensure security patches are applied for known vulnerabilities. |
108. Failing to account for system-wide security changes | Perform comprehensive audits after major system changes to ensure new configurations or patches don’t introduce new vulnerabilities. |
109. Overlooking password complexity and management | Conduct regular password policy reviews and use brute force protection tools to detect weak or easily guessable passwords. |
110. Not destroying compromised data completely | Use data destruction tools and forensic analysis to verify complete deletion of sensitive or compromised data. |
111. Not securing web servers after exploitation | Perform web server security scans and monitor server configurations to detect vulnerabilities left behind after exploitation. |
112. Failing to test payload functionality on multiple systems | Perform cross-system testing for payloads to ensure compatibility and monitor the spread of payloads using endpoint detection tools. |
113. Not accounting for physical access to servers during an attack | Implement physical access control measures and monitor logs for any signs of unauthorized physical access to sensitive devices or systems. |
114. Using predictable file names for malicious payloads | Conduct file name pattern analysis and use file integrity monitoring to detect suspicious file names and extensions that may indicate malware. |
115. Overlooking a victim’s multi-layered defenses | Regularly test the effectiveness of defense-in-depth measures (e.g., firewalls, intrusion prevention systems) and monitor for bypass attempts. |
116. Failing to hide command-and-control channels inside legitimate traffic | Use deep packet inspection (DPI) and traffic analysis to detect irregularities or covert channels that might blend with legitimate traffic. |
117. Using IP addresses that could easily be traced | Utilize IP anonymization techniques such as VPNs, proxies, or Tor to obscure the origin of attack traffic and use IP reputation tools to track suspicious IPs. |
118. Not taking advantage of the victim’s weak security policies | Perform thorough reconnaissance to identify and exploit weak security policies, while continuously auditing and updating security practices. |
119. Leaving malware footprints in network traffic | Monitor network traffic for anomalies or unusual patterns, using flow analysis and DPI tools to detect malware-related traffic. |
120. Failing to fully take control of the victim's network | Conduct internal network penetration tests to ensure full control over compromised segments and use lateral movement detection tools. |
121. Using ineffective proxies for anonymity | Regularly analyze proxy server effectiveness, using proxy detection tools and logs to identify low-quality or exposed proxies. |
122. Failing to delete malicious files from remote systems | Implement endpoint detection systems that scan for and alert on residual malicious files or suspicious file modifications. |
123. Not monitoring for failed attack attempts | Set up alerting systems to notify when repeated failed login attempts or attack pattern failures occur, such as failed RDP or SSH access attempts. |
124. Relying on too many external attack tools | Conduct security tool audits to assess vulnerabilities and misconfigurations introduced by external or open-source attack tools. |
125. Overlooking the target’s anti-spam and anti-phishing tools | Use email gateway monitoring and phishing detection systems to identify spoofed emails or suspicious links targeting users. |
126. Failing to understand the target’s patch management system | Review the patch management system’s logs and procedures to identify unpatched vulnerabilities or improper configurations. |
127. Using known attack methodologies without modifications | Use intrusion detection and anomaly detection systems to spot signature-based attack methods and monitor for patterns of unmodified attacks. |
128. Failing to detect endpoint behaviors that indicate an attack | Implement endpoint detection and response (EDR) systems to monitor for unusual behaviors such as unauthorized file access or changes in processes. |
129. Underestimating automated detection tools’ capabilities | Regularly evaluate and upgrade automated detection tools, ensuring they can identify emerging threats through signature-based and behavioral analysis. |
130. Overlooking physical security controls on target devices | Implement and monitor physical access control systems, ensuring that logs reflect authorized access to sensitive devices. |
131. Not making use of botnets for broader attacks | Detect botnet activities through unusual traffic spikes, communications with C&C servers, or scans for known botnet signatures using IDS/IPS systems. |
132. Failing to use appropriate decoy techniques | Implement decoy systems (honeypots) to monitor for unauthorized access attempts and track malicious activity in real-time. |
133. Ignoring corporate security awareness programs | Conduct security training and phishing simulations to test employee responses and measure awareness of social engineering attacks. |
134. Not customizing payloads based on target system types | Perform a system analysis to ensure that the payload is tailored to the specific environment, avoiding generic payloads that may fail detection. |
135. Failing to conduct recon on an organization’s IT infrastructure | Use reconnaissance tools like Shodan, Nmap, and Whois to perform detailed infrastructure mapping before conducting an attack. |
136. Using outdated C&C servers | Regularly audit C&C infrastructure for vulnerabilities and use threat intelligence to block connections to known malicious or outdated servers. |
137. Not verifying whether the target is actively monitoring | Perform red team exercises to test the target's detection and response capabilities, ensuring they are actively monitoring for attacks. |
138. Failing to destroy compromised software completely | Use system and software cleanup tools to remove all remnants of malicious code from compromised systems and verify removal with forensics. |
139. Using malware that is easily fingerprinted | Regularly update malware and use polymorphic or encrypted payloads to avoid detection by signature-based security solutions. |
140. Not verifying remote login configurations before exploitation | Use vulnerability scanners to assess remote login methods and configurations to identify potential weak spots or misconfigurations. |
141. Failing to mask phishing attempts | Implement email filtering and anomaly detection to identify phishing emails and mask their true origin by analyzing email headers and behavior. |
142. Leaving unused credentials in malware | Conduct malware analysis to ensure that no hardcoded credentials are left in malicious code that could be exploited. |
143. Overlooking multi-platform exploits | Test exploits on multiple platforms and operating systems to ensure the attack works across various environments and configurations. |
144. Using tools that reveal unusual traffic patterns | Monitor network traffic for irregularities in data flows and use anomaly detection systems to identify traffic patterns indicative of malicious activity. |
145. Failing to integrate with the victim's network environment effectively | Test the compatibility of attack tools and payloads with the target’s specific network environment, ensuring minimal disruptions during the attack. |
146. Underestimating the power of regular security audits | Conduct frequent vulnerability assessments, penetration tests, and audits to ensure the effectiveness of defense mechanisms and catch overlooked flaws. |
147. Failing to clean up or hide system modifications | Use file integrity checkers and system monitoring tools to identify unauthorized changes to system configurations and clean them up. |
148. Ignoring exploit chaining or escalation methods | Regularly assess attack vectors for opportunities to chain multiple exploits or escalate privileges within compromised systems. |
149. Not avoiding common attack signature patterns | Regularly update IDS/IPS systems and monitor for common attack signatures that can easily be detected by signature-based detection systems. |
150. Relying on obvious attack vectors like email phishing | Use advanced email filtering and anomaly detection techniques to identify and block suspicious phishing attempts or social engineering tactics. |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mistake a Hacker Might Make | How Network Security Professionals Can Find It |
---|---|
151. Failing to automate post-exploitation tasks | Implement task automation monitoring systems to detect unscheduled processes or unusual activity during post-exploitation phases. |
152. Not ensuring malware persistence after reboot | Monitor system processes and reboots for any persistence mechanisms (e.g., registry keys, startup folders) left behind by malware. |
153. Overlooking the potential for system rollback during an attack | Monitor system restore points and configuration backups to detect any rollbacks that could remove or alter attack footprints. |
154. Failing to hide activity through traffic encoding | Use packet inspection tools to detect unencoded traffic or anomalies that might reveal the attack's presence within the network. |
155. Using weak, non-anonymous C&C communication protocols | Monitor C&C communications for unencrypted or identifiable patterns; flag unusual or insecure protocols like HTTP or FTP. |
156. Overestimating the difficulty of bypassing simple firewalls | Perform regular penetration testing to detect vulnerabilities in firewall configurations and traffic analysis to identify bypass methods. |
157. Failing to sanitize input in exploit scripts | Use input validation tools and runtime protection to detect injection attacks or malformed data that could be used for exploits. |
158. Leaving attack tools open for inspection by other attackers | Conduct frequent scans for unprotected or leftover attack tools in compromised systems using file integrity monitoring systems. |
159. Using public-facing tools for private operations | Review network traffic and logs for unusual tool usage, particularly using public or common attack tools, which could be easily detected. |
160. Not modifying existing exploits for uniqueness | Implement anomaly detection systems to monitor for known exploit signatures and test environments to detect reused exploits. |
161. Relying too heavily on brute-force techniques | Monitor login attempts and detect patterns of failed login attempts using multi-factor authentication (MFA) and rate limiting. |
162. Failing to disable antivirus or security tools before executing malware | Use endpoint detection tools to monitor for antivirus processes or security tools that are actively protecting systems and trigger alerts when disabled. |
163. Underestimating the effectiveness of endpoint security detection | Perform real-time endpoint monitoring and use endpoint detection and response (EDR) systems to quickly detect abnormal behavior or malware. |
164. Failing to perform timely reconnaissance on a target | Conduct ongoing vulnerability scans and penetration tests to gather up-to-date intelligence on the target’s infrastructure. |
165. Using tools with known backdoors or vulnerabilities | Regularly update attack tools and scan for any known vulnerabilities in attack software through automated vulnerability management systems. |
166. Leaving exposed credentials in system configuration files | Conduct regular audits of configuration files for hardcoded credentials and use automated scanning tools to identify exposed secrets. |
167. Overlooking the victim's mobile security measures | Monitor mobile device traffic and security app configurations to detect and block attacks targeting mobile platforms. |
168. Failing to conduct targeted social engineering campaigns | Implement user training and simulated phishing campaigns to measure awareness and identify patterns of vulnerability to social engineering. |
169. Not setting up diverse attack strategies for different systems | Implement multi-vector defense mechanisms and simulate attacks on different systems to identify areas where hackers may focus their efforts. |
170. Using outdated malware versions | Regularly update malware signatures and use automated malware detection tools to identify known malware variants or outdated code. |
171. Leaving evidence of attempts on vulnerable systems | Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and log monitoring to detect unsuccessful attack attempts or other unusual activity that leaves traces. |
172. Overlooking cross-site scripting vulnerabilities for lateral movement | Perform comprehensive web application security assessments, including XSS vulnerability scans, to identify potential lateral movement vectors. |
173. Using easily tracked browser user-agents for exploits | Monitor browser user-agent strings for suspicious or non-standard patterns that could be used for fingerprinting malicious activity. |
174. Overcomplicating phishing schemes with too many elements | Monitor for suspicious email behavior and complexity, using email filtering systems to catch overcomplicated phishing attempts. |
175. Failing to use a multi-layer attack approach | Use defense-in-depth strategies and monitor for multiple simultaneous attacks, which could indicate multi-layered attack attempts. |
176. Leaving network services exposed after exploitation | Regularly scan the network for open ports or services that should no longer be active, and use network segmentation to reduce attack surface. |
177. Not considering network segmentation before lateral movement | Continuously monitor network segments for unauthorized lateral movement using network segmentation and traffic analysis tools. |
178. Underestimating the impact of endpoint protection on attacks | Perform endpoint security assessments to detect the effectiveness of installed endpoint protection systems in blocking or alerting on attacks. |
179. Failing to isolate the attack payload from the victim's network | Use network traffic monitoring and segmentation to ensure that attack payloads are contained and don't spread beyond their target area. |
180. Using shared or well-known mining pools | Monitor network traffic for connections to known mining pool addresses, and use threat intelligence sources to detect illicit mining activity. |
181. Not tracking and covering failed attack attempts | Monitor logs for failed attack attempts and automatically trigger alerts for multiple failed access attempts or unusual behavior. |
182. Failing to cover C&C server location | Use network monitoring tools to detect abnormal or suspicious outgoing traffic to known C&C servers and block such traffic in real time. |
183. Ignoring local system monitoring tools during exploitation | Continuously monitor system processes and audit file integrity to detect any malicious tools that might have been overlooked or activated. |
184. Using predictable DNS request patterns | Use DNS traffic analysis tools to detect abnormal or repetitive DNS queries that might be indicative of a compromised system or malicious activity. |
185. Overlooking encryption on malicious payloads | Inspect network traffic for unencrypted malicious payloads using deep packet inspection (DPI) tools, ensuring that all suspicious data is flagged. |
186. Leaving exploited systems connected to the internet | Use intrusion detection systems to identify systems that remain connected post-exploitation, signaling that they may still be vulnerable to remote access. |
187. Failing to handle the persistence of backdoors post-exploitation | Monitor system configurations and access controls for any backdoor persistence mechanisms, and use automated detection tools for unauthorized modifications. |
188. Not thoroughly testing exfiltration routes | Perform exfiltration testing and simulate data exfiltration methods to ensure any such activity is flagged by security systems. |
189. Underestimating user knowledge and awareness of security | Conduct regular security awareness training and phishing simulations to assess the level of security knowledge among employees. |
190. Failing to use traffic anonymization for C&C communications | Monitor C&C traffic for obfuscation patterns and use traffic analysis tools to identify unencrypted, non-anonymous communications. |
191. Ignoring potential security patches in the system after attack | Regularly audit systems for new security patches and vulnerabilities, and use patch management systems to ensure timely updates are applied. |
192. Relying on predictable malware code | Use behavioral analysis tools to detect and flag common or predictable malware code signatures, while ensuring regular updates to malware definitions. |
193. Failing to assess lateral movement potential before exploitation | Perform network topology mapping and simulate lateral movement paths to assess potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited. |
194. Overlooking the impact of system-wide monitoring | Continuously monitor system and network-wide activity for signs of malicious behavior using SIEM systems to centralize log and event data. |
195. Leaving exposed ports that could allow reverse shell access | Regularly scan for open ports and use intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to block unauthorized reverse shell connections. |
196. Overusing common attack strategies without adapting | Continuously evolve attack techniques and use threat intelligence feeds to ensure the attack methods employed are unique and hard to detect. |
197. Not analyzing the target’s full network topology | Perform thorough network mapping and vulnerability scans to identify the full scope of the target’s network and identify weak points. |
198. Failing to modify malicious software to adapt to new detection systems | Regularly modify malware and use obfuscation techniques to adapt it to updated anti-virus and detection systems. |
199. Relying on public attack methods without encryption | Ensure encryption is used for all C&C communication and avoid using easily identifiable public attack methods without adding custom modifications. |
200. Ignoring environmental security measures and physical controls | Perform physical security audits and ensure that the victim’s environmental security measures (e.g., data center access) are considered when planning an attack. |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Sameer Naik
Comments
Post a Comment